Home > t
AEC Spec-Sheet Scoring Matrix — Commercial Automatic Soap Dispensers
AEC / FACILITY MANAGER EVALUATION TOOL

Commercial Automatic Soap Dispensers — Spec-Sheet Scoring Matrix (Side-by-Side Brands)

This page converts a decision-grade checklist into a spec-ready scoring matrix for architects, designers, and facility managers. Scores are evidence-based from public product pages/spec sheets (see references at bottom). Where a criterion is not explicitly stated, it is scored conservatively.

Architect / Engineer Review High-Traffic Restrooms Touchless Hygiene Serviceability Lifecycle / TCO

Score Key (0–3)

0 — Does Not Meet / Not DocumentedFails requirement or no supporting spec evidence.
1 — Partial / Generic ClaimImplied feature, but not quantified or limited scope.
2 — Meets Commercial StandardClear commercial-grade support, but not best-in-class.
3 — Exceeds / AEC-Grade EvidenceExplicit spec language or strong, verifiable performance design.
0 1 2 3 Each cell includes a short evidence note + source link.

Brands Compared

Sloan, Fontana, Delta, BathSelect, plus five additional top commercial brands: GOJO/PURELL, Rubbermaid Commercial, Bobrick, Bradley, ASI (American Specialties).

Tip: For a project submittal, replace “brand-level” scoring with your exact model numbers and re-score each row.

Sensor & Performance

4 criteria • IR / ToF considerations • false-trigger control
Decision-Grade Criterion SloanFontanaDeltaBathSelectGOJO / PURELLRubbermaidBobrickBradleyASI
Does the sensor activate consistently in under 0.25 seconds?
1
Sensor-activated; no <0.25s claim in ESD-400 spec.
Spec
1
“Fast dispense response” language; no <0.25s timing published.
Spec language
1
Sensor detects user’s hand; no <0.25s timing published.
Spec
1
Activation time listed as <1 second (not <0.25s).
Product spec
1
Touch-free; dose calibrated. No <0.25s claim.
ES8
1
Touch-free controlled dispensing; no <0.25s claim.
AutoFoam
1
Sensor-activated valve; no published timing.
Tech data (PDF)
1
Touch-free IR activation; no <0.25s claim.
Spec (PDF)
1
Hands-free automatic; no <0.25s claim.
20364
Is false-triggering prevented in bright or reflective environments?
3
Double IR sensors + adaptive self-adjust range documented.
Spec sheet (PDF)
2
“Reduced false triggers” stated for ToF/IR sensing; not quantified.
Source
1
Not explicitly documented on DESD spec sheet.
Spec
2
Self-adjusting sensor range listed (helps reduce mis-triggers).
Product spec
1
Not explicitly documented on ES8 page.
ES8
1
Not explicitly documented on AutoFoam page.
AutoFoam
1
Not explicitly documented in B-2012 tech data.
Tech data
3
Explicit: sensor tech designed to eliminate false activations.
Spec (PDF)
1
Not explicitly documented for 20364.
Spec (PDF)
Does the sensor work reliably with wet or gloved hands?
1
Not explicitly documented for ESD-400.
Spec
1
Not explicitly documented on collection page.
Source
1
Not explicitly documented on DESD spec.
Spec
1
Not explicitly documented on BS9844C page.
Product spec
1
Not explicitly documented on ES8 page.
ES8
1
Not explicitly documented on AutoFoam page.
AutoFoam
1
Not explicitly documented in B-2012 tech data.
Tech data
1
Not explicitly documented in 6-3300 spec.
Spec
1
Not explicitly documented for 20364.
20364
Is the sensing range factory-calibrated for commercial sinks?
3
Nominal sensor range + adaptive self-adjustment range documented.
Spec sheet (PDF)
2
Commercial ToF/IR positioning; “reliable activation” stated (no range table).
Source
1
Not documented as calibrated range in DESD spec excerpt.
Spec
2
Self-adjusting sensor range is explicitly stated.
Product spec
1
Not documented on ES8 page as calibrated range.
ES8
1
Not documented as calibrated range on AutoFoam page.
AutoFoam
1
Not documented as calibrated range in B-2012 tech data.
Tech data
2
Commercial sensor system designed to integrate with faucets; no range table.
Spec
1
Not documented as calibrated range in 20364 spec.
Spec

Dosing & Soap Control

4 criteria • consistent dose • adjustability • anti-drip
Decision-Grade Criterion SloanFontanaDeltaBathSelectGOJO / PURELLRubbermaidBobrickBradleyASI
Is the soap output volume precisely controlled per activation?
3
Spec: pre-measured foam application (on-demand) + sensor control.
Listing w/ spec highlights
3
“Adjustable dosing” + “consistent output” positioning across ToF dispenser collection.
Collection spec language
2
Automatic dispense via sensor; “adjustable soap quantity” available (remote accessory).
Distributor spec summary
3
Flow rate range is published (1–4.5 ml/s) enabling controlled dosing.
BS9844C
3
Dispenser + formulation calibrated to provide optimal dose (explicit).
ES8
3
Reliable, controlled dispensing (explicit) + concentrated refills for more handwashes.
AutoFoam
2
Corrosion-resistant valve dispenses a variety of liquid soaps (not quantified dose).
B-2012 tech data
2
Touch-free dispense; foam/liquid capability stated (dose not quantified).
6-3300 spec
3
Owner-adjustable single-shot volume range is explicitly published (factory set 1 ml).
Spec summaryPDF
Can the dosage be adjusted for liquid, foam, or spray?
1
ESD-400 is foam-focused in published spec (not multi-mode).
Spec
2
Programmable/adjustable dosing stated; multi-soap compatibility varies by model.
Source
2
Adjustable quantity via remote (accessory) documented by distributors.
Source
2
Time/amount adjustable language appears on multiple deck-mount models.
Example model
1
System is refill-family dependent; calibration is formulation-specific.
ES8
1
Platform depends on refill type; “controlled dispensing” is explicit, multi-mode not.
AutoFoam
2
Dispenses variety of liquid soaps + alcohol-based sanitizers (explicit compatibility).
Tech data
2
Foam or liquid soap stated; system support depends on assembly.
Spec
2
Liquid soap + gel sanitizer supported; adjustable volume; viscosity/pH constraints documented.
Spec (PDF)
Does the dispenser prevent dripping after each cycle?
2
“Designed for drip-free foam dispensing” appears in ESD-400 highlights.
Source
3
Explicit: anti-drip hardware / no-drip valve on ToF dispenser collection page.
Source
1
Not explicitly documented for DESD in public spec excerpts.
Spec
1
Not explicitly documented for BS9844C.
Product page
1
Not explicitly documented for ES8 hardware as anti-drip.
ES8
1
Not explicitly documented as anti-drip on AutoFoam page.
AutoFoam
1
Not explicitly documented as anti-drip in B-2012 tech data.
Tech data
1
Not explicitly documented as anti-drip in 6-3300 spec excerpt.
Spec
1
Not explicitly documented as anti-drip; emphasis is on compatibility ranges.
Spec
Is soap waste measurably reduced compared to manual units?
1
No quantitative waste reduction stated on ESD-400 spec excerpts.
Spec
2
Positioning: adjustable dosing + anti-drip reduces mess/waste (not quantified).
Source
1
Not quantified on DESD spec excerpts.
Spec
2
Controlled output via published flow range supports waste control (not quantified).
Product spec
2
Dose calibration language supports waste control; no quantified reduction.
ES8
2
Controlled dispensing + more handwashes per refill (cost/waste positioning).
AutoFoam
1
No quantified waste reduction in B-2012 tech data.
Tech data
1
No quantified waste reduction in 6-3300 spec excerpt.
Spec
1
No quantified waste reduction in 20364 spec; focus is dosing range and requirements.
Spec

Important note about “line-by-line evidence”

Why some cells score 1 instead of 2–3 Many manufacturers do not publicly publish certain AEC-grade claims (e.g., “<0.25s activation”, “wet/gloved reliability”, or “measured waste reduction”) on open product pages. In those cases this matrix scores conservatively and links to the best available public evidence. For bid/spec packages, replace these with the project submittal cut sheets and re-score.

Primary Evidence References (Public)

Sloan — ESD-400 Specs ESD-400 spec (PDF_